Resolved by the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives meeting in Congress, that Congress makes the territory properly belong to the Republic of Texas and rightly, can be built in a new state called the State of Texas, with a Republican form of government, adopted by the people of this republic , by the members of the Convention who were gathered with the agreement of the government in place to allow the same one of the EU states. William Henry Harrison, a candidate for the presidency of the Whig Party, defeated US President Martin Van Buren in the 1840 general election. After Harrison`s death shortly after his inauguration, Vice President John Tyler took over as president. [49] President Tyler was expelled from the Whig party in 1841 for repeatedly vetoing national finance laws. Tyler, isolated and outside the mainstream bipartisan current, turned to foreign policy to save his presidency and joined a right-wing group in the South that shared his ardent expansionist ideas on slavery. [50] Jones was elected president of Texas in September 1844 and took office in December. He had not given a campaign speech, had not committed to annexation, and had not mentioned the subject in his inaugural address. After the election of James K. Polk as President of the United States on a platform of “Reannexion (??) America and President John Tyler`s proposal to be annexed by a joint resolution, Jones continued his silence. But the Texas Congress said it was in favor of EU membership.

(Note: How did the Texas Congress say it would join when they were postponed and never convened again?) Before Jones was formally informed of the joint resolution, the accusations of England and France prompted him to delay the measures by ninety days. He promised to get Mexico recognition of Texas independence and delayed the nomination of the Texas Congress or a congress. Meanwhile, the sense of annexation and resentment towards Jones has increased. He was burned in the effigy, and threats were made to overthrow his government, but he remained silent until Charles Elliot returned from Mexico with the recognition contract. Walker`s pamphlet has attracted strong demands from pro-slavery expansionists in the South for Texas; in the north, he allowed anti-slavery expansionists to embrace Texas without allying with pro-slavery extremists. [97] His hypotheses and analyses “marked and framed the debates on annexation, but its premises remained largely unchallenged in the press and in public opinion. [98] The Missouri Crisis of 1819-1821 reinforced the obligations of expansionism among the interests of slavery in the country, when Thomas`s so-called Proviso drew the parallel of 36-30 which, in the louisiana Purchase countries, imposed the future of free soil and the land of slaves. [10] While a majority of members of the Southern Congress accepted the exclusion of slavery from most of Louisiana`s purchase, a significant minority opposed it.

[11] The publisher of Richmond Enquirer of Virginia, Thomas Ritchie, predicted that the South, with the restrictions, would eventually need Texas: “If we are crammed north, we must have an elbow space to the west.” [13] [14] Virginia Congressman John Floyd accused Foreign Minister Adams in 1824 of leaving Spain in 1819 in the interests of the supporters of slavery in North Texas, thereby depriving the South of other slave countries. [15] John Tyler, then a representative of Virginia, invoked Jefferson`s territorial and commercial growth objectives as a national objective to counter the growing sectoral divergence on slavery.